Note: There is much more to the concept of
government neutrality regarding religion than can be presented here in Lesson
1. In a later lesson, you will have opportunity to delve further into the
background in law (e.g., key court rulings and consequences for public school
classrooms) that forms the basis for this concept.
Reading [
Lesson 1]
New glossary terms at end of reading
Role of the School
For most youngsters, it is the nonsectarian public schools that
mold their conceptions of citizenship. It is perhaps through their schooling and
the conduct of their classroom teachers that budding citizens can learn best
what it means to live in a country where the notion of citizens’ “equality
under the law” is so fundamental and has been stated so
clearly.
Liberty of conscience (religious liberty) is a right bestowed on all
Americans. Through its laws, our nation acknowledges for every citizen
the important human rights bestowed by the First Amendment to the United States
Constitution. For over 50 years the U. S. Supreme Court has taken neutrality as
its touchstone in settling court cases related to the relationship of religion
to government and to the public schools. This governmental neutrality is
what best enables protection of each citizen's "liberty of
conscience."
As government institutions, public schools must be neutral
in two senses: they must be neutral among religions (they cannot
privilege one religion over another), and they must be neutral between
religion and nonreligion (they cannot privilege religion generally over
nonreligion). To give preference to any religion's outlook through policy or
practice would be an "establishment of religion" that violates the
first of
the two religious liberty clauses in the First Amendment. Public schools are to
be places where people of every faith and none are treated
with fairness and respect.
Neutrality and fairness is possible, however, only when teachers clearly
understand their roles and their mandate to act on behalf of all citizens.
As a public school teacher, you owe to all the children you teach
equitable consideration, acknowledging each as an individual who is fully free
to hold to his or her individual faith position. Schools uphold the First
Amendment when teachers act impartially and protect the religious liberty rights
of students of all faiths or none.
It is important that those responsible for and involved in public education
be fully cognizant of the broad spectrum of religious and nonreligious perspectives that may be
present in any American classroom. It is the school's job--their job--to
ensure that each child’s freedom of conscience is duly valued.
Responding to Diversity
In public school, there must be recognition of the rights
of people living in a free society to choose between the various faith systems
or secular philosophies as well as their right to reject any one or all of such faith
systems or philosophies. All
students are deserving of commensurate regard whether they hold to a familiar
religion, to an unfamiliar or minority one, or reject religion entirely.
Each budding citizen has a freedom of conscience and belief deserving of respect
and safeguarding.
Impartiality regarding religion is a watchword for those teaching in
the public schools, but it is easier said than done. Most teachers know
that it is not appropriate for any one child’s religious or nonreligious beliefs to be given
favor over another’s. Just as public school teachers may neither advance
nor inhibit any religious doctrine, neither should they promote religion over
nonreligion. When interacting with your students regarding the religion
realm, you will
continuously strive to meet the challenge of regarding evenhandedly the
varied worldviews and outlooks you will encounter.
As a professional, you will attempt to respond to these various
outlooks in an impartial and academic sense. This stance accords to those
children who abide by unusual or unfamiliar faith systems, and to those who may
reject all faiths, the same respect and consideration you give to the youngsters
who affirm your own worldview or who adhere to conventional belief systems that
are more familiar to you.
There is an oft-stated maxim known as the “golden rule.” It appears in
some form in almost all religions. It is present in most secular philosophies as
well. And, in complying with its edict, you will be granting to those who
have contrasting beliefs on matters linked to conscience (e.g., philosophy,
ethics, cosmology) the same regard you would wish to be given
persons who share your own outlook.
To any student’s question, you will respond as sensitively and factually
as you can. Whether the questioner follows a majority faith, or a minority
faith, or no faith at all will not matter. This is not to say that, in doing so,
you are bestowing on the worldviews themselves equivalent cultural legitimacy.
Nor are you deeming them equally valid. Rather, by your conduct, you are
upholding the right of each student you are teaching to have and
adhere to his or her faith (or non-faith) convictions. All the students in your
classroom can be at ease and free of apprehension on this count.
As the classroom teacher, you impart an image to students of how America
looks upon its citizen’s religious freedom. In a civil classroom, no students
need ever feel distress of teacher condescension or classmate derision for
having their religious (or skeptical/unbelieving) ideology.
Teachers who aim for the neutrality ideal and model it in their classrooms
will help the students (proto-citizens all) to look upon one another with
similar fairness. The respectful acknowledgment of each person’s individual
liberty of conscience will carry forward to the future.
_________
Corrections and comments invited. [last modified:
8/18/01]
Author: Mynga Futrell, Ph.D.
GLOSSARY TERMS: belief system \
cosmology \ ethics \ faith
position \ faith(s) \ faith system \ no
faith/none \ nonsectarian \ philosophy \ public school \
religion \ secular philosophy
End of Reading. Return
to Guide Sheet.